On the same day that you carried league tables for universities, you published a report showing that higher education is to be left out of the "radical reform" of post-compulsory education (THES, April 23).
The two stories show that while the old binary divide persists, a new divide is opening. FE, adult education and training are on one side; HE on the other. Each has a different attitude to measuring quality.
HE institutions have nine indicators, of which only three show anything about quality of education (teaching assessment, research assessment exercise and destinations).
Indicators in the FE and training sectors are closer to a market logic, but scarcely better for it. At least there is an attempt to calculate drop-out rates, but there are no valid data for students' destinations.
A truly radical rethink would go across all sectors.
Judith Watson
School of Post-Compulsory Education and Training, University of Greenwich
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login