Journals to reward peer reviewers with publishing discounts

PeerJ will give contributors ‘tokens’ to be redeemed against article processing charges

February 4, 2022
5th September 2021, Drogheda, County Louth, Ireland. Carnival ride kiosk at an outdoors public funfair at Matthews Lane, Drogheda.
Source: iStock

A family of open access journals will reward its peer reviewers by paying them in “tokens” that can be redeemed as discounts towards publishing costs.

The move by PeerJ comes amid long-running debate about how to recognise the contribution of researchers at a key stage of the academic publishing process, which is typically unremunerated and is still often conducted on behalf of subscription, for-profit periodicals.

PeerJ, which publishes a series of open access journals, said that scholars would earn 10 tokens for each submission they review, equivalent to a $100 (£74) discount on an article processing charge.

Tokens will have no expiry date and can be “stacked” to maximise discounts. Co-authors will be able to pool tokens and put them towards a single submission, the publisher said.

“By fairly incentivising engagement and contribution we hope that more academics and researchers will sign up to review submissions made to our seven journals,” said Pete Binfield, PeerJ’s publisher and co-founder. “We know that our contributors’ time is valuable, and we think they deserve to be rewarded for their contributions.”

Academic editors will also earn tokens for handling contributions. In addition, contributors will be able to transfer their tokens to other PeerJ users to help them with publication fees.

A similar model was trialled in 2016 by Veruscript, a London-based publisher of science and humanities journals.

Meanwhile Publons, an online platform that allows academics to record and receive credit for their peer review activity, was acquired in 2017 by Clarivate Analytics.

chris.havergal@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

Farcical. What should happen is that authors get paid for their work, whether that is writing or reviewing articles. The business model currently applied would not be accepted anywhere else. Tokens? Tokenism more like.
MDPI already gives reviewers vouchers that can be redeemed against APCs, so this isn't new, but since APCs are likely to become a thing of the past thanks to Plan S and read-and-publish deals, what is one supposed to do with these vouchers/tokens then?

Sponsored