Bullying support network launched due to universities’ ‘inaction’

Group hopes to instigate culture change in UK higher education to stop ‘toleration’ of bullies

November 1, 2023
Source: iStock

UK university staff who have been the victim of bullying are being offered support by a new network amid repeated evidence that the problem is “endemic” in higher education.

Those behind the 21 Group – named after the percentage of staff members at the University of Cambridge who reported experiencing bullying in a 2020 survey – said it was needed because of a failure of universities to tackle the issue beyond “sloganising”.

It aims to conduct research to establish the true extent of bullying in UK universities and campaign for the creation of an independent ombudsman position that would take the handling of complaints away from being the sole domain of the internal processes of institutions.

Wyn Evans, professor of astrophysics at Cambridge – and one of the founders of the network – said it has its roots in a Times Higher Education article in which he claimed that bullying was “a feature of UK research universities, not a bug”, which prompted several people to come forward to share their own experiences.

The network consists of both university staff who have experienced bullying and those who have witnessed the “pain and hurt” it causes, according to Professor Evans.

He said despite ample evidence of the scale of bullying within universities – with many surveys putting the figure higher than the Cambridge poll – it is too often tolerated.

“The main obstacle is that senior management of universities come under pressure to hush things up – which clearly happens very often now,” Professor Evans said.

“Far too many UK universities prioritise limiting reputational damage to the institution over doing the right thing for their staff and students.

“This is because the bully is normally a senior professor or head of department. They are normally much more valuable to the university than the victim, who is often a student or a member of the professional services support staff.”

Professor Evans said a new body was needed to look at complaints because “organisations that investigate themselves exonerate themselves; they look for rugs enormous enough to sweep everything under”.

He pointed out that undergraduate students are able to take grievances to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education if they are unhappy with how they are dealt with internally, but there was no similar mechanism in place for staff or postgraduates.

As well as its more policy-focused work, the 21 Group aims to offer peer-to-peer support for the victims of bullying via informal advice and the chance to share experiences.

Because of the need to maintain confidentiality as bullying complaints are investigated, individuals are often left “feeling lonely, forsaken and with mental health problems” for months – or even years, Professor Evans said.

He said what was needed was cultural change similar to that seen around sexual misconduct following the MeToo movement, which has now resulted in staff-student relationships being strongly discouraged or banned.

“Pressure groups are needed to drive organisational and cultural change in UK universities,” said Professor Evans. “We are optimistic that the 21 Group can drive a sea change in attitudes to bullying in UK universities quickly.”

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

I believe the problem would be eased if institutions published a Code of Conduct for managers. They would then know what is expected of them and staff would have a framework for complaints.
I am afraid it is too ingrained. I have experienced/observed horrific bullying at most (not all) of the Universities in which I have worked in UK; I never experienced this in Australia. The worst bullies from what I have seen are well protected, narcissistic and... rise to the top.
Sadly, even if there is a code, the lower level managers will hush it up and not report any bullying to line management. Even if they did, I am yet to see an academic who has been disciplined for bullying and harassing another academic or other staff member.
Having been a victim of bullying in my curent institution I wanted accountability and action from my Director but got neither, in fact I got so little in the way of support I actually felt worse for raising it with him. I was forced to leave the job I had done for nearly 2 decades and move to a different function which helped me but hid the fact there was a problem. 2 other colleagues in the same team were subsequently forced to move roles due to the same issue . External reporting with published statistics is the only way this problem will ever be resolved. (Employing people fit for the role not just because they are friends with managers on the recruitment panel would also help !)

Sponsored