Phil Baty suggests universities are targeting small donors to avoid the earmarking that sometimes happens with large gifts ("Spare us a million, guv?", THES, November 12). This is far too simplistic.
Universities target many donors. If we ignore smaller ones, they will rarely give, and even more rarely become large ones. If we ignore larger ones then we will never raise the gifts that change institutions.
Baty suggests the "universities' techniques are becoming more ingenious" and then refers to legacies and "cold calling". Legacies have been part of the UK philanthropic agenda for hundreds of years and I know of no UK university that phones alumni without first informing them by letter.
Adrian Beney Deputy director, development and alumni relations, University of Durham
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login