Even though both reviewer and author happen to be professional astronomers, it is surprising that Owen Gingerich ("Born under a wandering star", THES, October 22) seems unaware that few, if any, New Testament scholars accept the Star of Bethlehem narrative as historical. Recorded as it is in one gospel only (Matthew's), it is usually regarded as yet another of the writer's attempts to fulfil a particular prediction, in this case Numbers xxiv:17, by means of invented narrative.
As Gibbon sarcastically (but correctly) observed 200 years ago, it is inconceivable that an "event" such as this would have gone unnoticed by contemporary Roman or Jewish historians; and equally inconceivable that such corroboration, had it been forthcoming, would not have been made the most of by later Christian apologists.
Brian Thomas
Bentley, Surrey
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login