I am puzzled by Nottingham University's persistence over its tobacco funding ("Notts cancer team at risk", THES, February 9). Tobacco is the world's most despicable legal industry, far worse than pornography, which, unlike tobacco, does not tend to kill its customers.
Suppose that a pornography provider wanted to fund a centre of popular culture at Nottingham, with particular reference to studying The Sun's Page 3, Loaded and top-shelf magazines (which would promptly be nicknamed "The Tits'n'Bums Centre"). Having accepted tobacco money, would Nottingham University accept the funding from a leading pornography company?
Tony Eccles
London NW6
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login