Immigration check refusenik stripped of Keele fellowship

Long-serving medieval historian Philip Morgan evicted from office after refusing to show his passport for ‘right-to-work’ check

十一月 9, 2022
Border Force check the passports of passengers arriving at Gatwick Airport to illustrate Immigration check refusenik stripped of Keele fellowship
Source: Getty

A historian who was stripped of his honorary fellowship by Keele University after he refused to comply with “hostile environment” immigration checks said he had been “thunderstruck” by his treatment.

Philip Morgan, who retired as a senior lecturer from Keele in 2019, said he was given just five days to move out of an office associated with his honorary post when he questioned why he needed to show his passport for a “right to work” check upon his return to teach at a summer school in August.

Having worked full-time at the Midlands university for 35 years until his retirement, since when he has taught postgraduates on a part-time basis, Dr Morgan questioned whether the checks were necessary. He later explained that he had “profound objections” to the 2016 Immigration Act, introduced by Theresa May when she was home secretary, which is often seen as having created a “hostile environment” for migrants by requiring landlords, employers and public authorities to undertake multiple checks of identity documents.

However, Dr Morgan said, he was told that he should apologise for the “impatience and intransigence” shown in his emails and submit the “necessary” paperwork. When he declined to do so, he was informed by Donna Lee, executive dean of Keele’s Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, that his honorary title would be “withdrawn with immediate effect.” He was given a week to empty his office and download research materials before he was evicted.

“I was completely thunderstruck – it seems like vengefulness to punish me in this way,” said Dr Morgan, who has also lost email and library access.

“Everyone assumes that I must have done something awful, or been abusive, to be punished like this. But I have to explain that this isn’t the case.”

Asked about one email sent to human resources, in which he requested £250 as a “fee for helping” with the right-to-work check, Dr Morgan denied that it was unprofessional, stating: “It was meant as a joke – it was clearly a flippant comment.”

“It seems a harsh punishment, not just because of my 30-plus years of service to the university, but I was also helping out during the pandemic, teaching on Teams and supervising postgraduates, as well as on summer schools,” he said.

On why he did not submit his passport, Dr Morgan said he believed the legislation had caused hardship for immigrants in the UK and was responsible for the Windrush scandal, in which Commonwealth citizens were illegally detained and deported because they did not possess the right documents, having emigrated to the UK as children at a time when they did not have passports of their own.

“It would be quite easy to wave my passport and say ‘I’m OK’, but the Windrush generation couldn’t do this,” he said. “In any case, it’s not a legal requirement, and I couldn’t imagine it would be such a huge issue – I thought they would apply some common sense.”

Dr Morgan said he has yet to hear about his appeal to Keele’s council, but said he had been told by the vice-chancellor, Trevor McMillan, that senior leaders supported the disciplinary measures because “his response to a reasonable request from HR was not appropriate” and it was “imperative that we continue to be able to meet legislative obligations that safeguard our ability to operate internationally”.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (11)

Is the real reason that he's Welsh?
Obviously a lot more to this - if you need to prove your employment and residency status, you need to prove it. This does seem like it's escalated based on points of principle and argument rather than reasonableness. Employers are legally obliged to make certain checks and can be liable for not making them. In general though, what is it with privileged employment options ? Where you can retire from a senior post three years ago yet remain employed ? Seems to happen a lot, but in general in the upper pay bands ?
No one likes enforcing that rule, but employers have to do it. Making life difficult for admin staff just doing their job is not on. Sounds like he enjoyed being awkward about it - well dodged by Keele I think.
You can only pull off such intransigence in academia if you are a big star. Seems he was not.
Big brother is watching You!
Wonder what would have happened if he had not had a passport anyway or if his passport had expired?
There appears to have been a complete failure of common sense... as there so often is when the administrative dog is allowed to wag the institutional tail. I was asked to prove my identity AGAIN when applying to do a staff PhD. Er, I work here. You know who I am. I have already brought my passport in when I started working here. Did you not make a note? Apparently not :)
Philip Morgan, a colleague of mine, was denied the right to enter a defence when charged. His appeal to Council was adjudicated by the head of HR, the very department demanding verification of the right to work. So a party to the dispute adjudicates itself. Justice?
As an honorary appointment Dr Morgan could have chosen to waive his teaching remuneration, thereby becoming classed as a volunteer. The 2006 legislation requiring proof of right to work does not apply to volunteers.
This case highlights the fact that university staff are complicit in the UK's border regime, and the institution's intemperate response suggests that it will brook no challenge to that complicity. I fear many more will have to make nuisances of themsleves before that changes, maybe even at the cost - God forbid! - of a little inconvenience to the admin staff.
I was absolutely shocked he wasn’t a part of the team on Keele’s summer palaeography course. Philip’s incredible character, immense professionalism, and particular expertise are unmatched. I would not consider visiting Keele again for this treatment, and any plans for the many occasions I dreamt I would be visiting again have been dashed. I simply am in disbelief that any person alive would dream of dismissing a literal giant in the field over his adherence to principles! His work is absolutely remarkable, his conference presentations were the most engaging and informative for my particular interests as well. I thought I would always be able to find him at Keele for guidance. I am filled with incredible sadness now, knowing I was only lucky enough to have attended the summer course and learn so much from him just once. This is an absolutely crushing loss for all of us so keen to immerse ourselves in late medieval Cheshire. I cannot express how much sorrow I feel having just read that this is the reason for his absence. What a terrible and unjust shame.
ADVERTISEMENT