Women ‘take 15 years more than men’ to become professors

Analysis of Russell Group data says female researchers are more likely to stay at lower pay grades or to leave the sector

June 19, 2024
A woman rubs her eyes as if tired or downhearted
Source: iStock/Jirapong Manustrong

It takes women almost 15 years longer than men to progress to full professorships at top UK universities on average, according to a new study.

The paper, published in Applied Economics, analyses Higher Education Statistics Agency data for Russell Group universities from 2004-05 to 2019-20.

It finds that it took female employees 8.5 years longer than their male colleagues, on average, to achieve associate professor status.

It then took a further 6.1 years more for women to secure full professorships, according to lead author Richard Harris, professor of economics at Durham University.

A theoretical model developed by Professor Harris with Mariluz Mate-Sanchez-Val and Manuel Ruiz Marín, both of the Technical University of Cartagena in Spain, indicated that female academics in Russell Group universities were 6 per cent less likely to be full professors over the period, 4 per cent less likely to be associate professors and 10 per cent more likely to remain in other grades.

The study suggests that discrimination and cultural bias can lead to gender gaps in promotion and increased chances of exiting the sector at each academic grade.

Professor Harris said women’s publications were often discounted and “given a lower weight compared with men”, while they also faced “cultural bias” because they were not afforded the same time and resources to invest in their careers.

“The cost of investment you need to make to be able to achieve career grade steps to get a strong publication record…women find it more costly to make those investments, costly in time, costly in effort,” he said.

“They’re undervalued, so it’s sort of the age-old story really. Women have to prove themselves twice to show that they are as good as men.”

The paper also highlights that institutional equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) strategies often incorrectly focus on changing women rather than addressing structural issues.

“In EDI policies, you’ve got to actually change the culture, allow for the fact that the system is innately biased, discriminatory,” said Professor Harris.

“EDI policies in universities need to be changes in the culture, not systems for promotion or recruitment that are looking at individuals and take out the gender.”


Campus resource collection: Gender equality in higher education - how to overcome key challenges


In order to improve gender parity, the paper recommends acknowledging gender differences in publication rates and research grant success, which disadvantage women in promotion applications.

It also calls on UK universities to emphasise the importance of organisational culture, evaluation practices and institutional procedures when hiring and promoting both men and women.

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

No surprises here then. Same old, same old.
This is very recognisable, sadly. I'm female academic at a Russell Group university and I've seen male colleagues promoted to professor based on "promise", i.e. they have an interesting idea for a book or grant. Meanwhile, women need a proven track record, i.e. successful grant applications worth several £100K. I've been told that that's essential to apply for a promotion. A male prof in my department only got his first grant of £45K several years after his promotion to full prof so how exactly does that work? There's also strong pressure to do student-facing work and pastoral care, which is important but unrecognised and unrewarded. When you look around the room at these events, you rarely see male colleagues serving up lunch, chatting to students, organising quizzes and socials, etc. You can of course disengage and say no but you get blowback.

Sponsored