In his review of Pascal Richet's A Natural History of Time (Books, August 10), Keith Thomson says that philosophers, faced with conundrums such as "What is time?" or "Does time exist if nothing is changing?" will "seek for the deep meanings".
I don't think they will. Rather, they will start by working out whether such questions make sense.
If they decide, as I have, that the word "time" is not one to which the interrogative "what?" or the verb "exist" can be sensibly applied, they will not look for deep meanings, but just throw the questions in the bin.
Michael Bulley
Chalon-sur-Saone France
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login