Evolutionary psychology is all that Steven and Hilary Rose accuse it of - and more. Most damning is its Cartesian, naively "realist" epistemology.
Hence not only its reductionism; its "property" dualisms falsely dividing facts/values, part/whole,and so on; its unverifiable speculations (and just-so stories); the ideological loop and self-deception of its Flintstones projection of capitalist values and patterns - but its incompatibility with key, new discoveries in visual art on perception and creativity; and its closed hall of mirrors, impervious to falsifying evidence and reason.
But given that ideology, culture, nature and biology are all factors that determine our survival, flourishing or extinction, the bad science of EP is not destiny, certainly not if we have the non-Cartesian, interdisciplinary and ecological vision to show that it isn't.
David Rodway
Lecturer in art and philosophy
Kensington and Chelsea College London
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login