The claim that generativist linguistics is "dead in its stall" (Books, THES , February 15) is based on a misunderstanding. Generativists believe language has properties that should be construed psychologically, rather than sociologically, and that these are best understood by constructing formal theoretical models.
The application of scientific methods to studying human language has proved fruitful, leading to discoveries ranging from constraints on patterns of word stress to the peculiar variation across languages in the behaviour of question words such as "who" and "why".
Thousands of researchers work successfully using this framework to develop practical grammars of languages, to understand the nature of language acquisition and change, and to provide models for how we process language psychologically.
David Adger
Lecturer in linguistics
University of York
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login