University equality efforts blamed for ‘hierarchy of oppression’

Professor says universities are still prioritising gender and other issues over tackling racism

三月 22, 2024
A Monopoly 'get out of jail free' card
Source: iStock/martince2

University policies that are designed to promote equality instead create a “hierarchy of oppression” and give racists a “get out of jail free card”, according to a leading scholar.

In her new book, Race and Education: Reproducing White Supremacy in Britain, Kalwant Bhopal writes of how she entered academia “naively thinking it would be a safe haven, inclusive and tolerant”.

In fact, universities were “not safe spaces, and they probably never have been”, said the professor of education and social justice at the University of Birmingham. “Given the current economic, political and social climate that we live in, given the fragile times in which we live…racism is allowed to flourish.”

In the book, Professor Bhopal describes higher education as a “white space that perpetuates structural, institutional and individual racism”.


Campus resource collection: Being Black in the academy


Her research reveals that inequality for ethnic minority students begins in school but continues into higher education, where they remain under-represented at the more prestigious universities, are less likely than their white peers to obtain a higher-class degree, and encounter racism on a regular basis.

The book also shows that ethnic minority staff working in higher education also regularly report being subjected to racism by their colleagues and students, are less likely to be professors or occupy senior managerial positions and more likely to earn less and be on a fixed-term or zero-hours contract compared with their white colleagues.

Professor Bhopal said equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) measures that have been introduced in the sector had failed to tackle “day-to-day racism”. Too often, she said, gender and other factors were given more importance.

Her research has found that gender equality policies, such as the Athena Swan Charter, have often acted as a “smokescreen” at the expense of ethnic minority groups, with white women the main beneficiaries.

“In the hierarchy of oppression…race always takes the back seat. In an EDI agenda that’s already crowded, there’s no time for race,” she said.

“Every university has to take this issue seriously – and the measures cannot be piecemeal; they cannot be tokenistic; they cannot be tick-box,” she added.

“But the real challenge is how you tackle that individual racism. Structural and institutional racism gives white people a get out of jail free card.”

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

Those who have a particular area of interest rather than a commitment to true equality of all human beings will never be satisfied because their particular thing is - rightly, in my opinion - not prioritised amidst the myriad factors, all based on what people ARE (something over which they have no choice) rather than what they DO (which they do control), that we have to take account of when ensuring that everybody, every single human being we deal with, is treated fairly and gets a chance to shine.
Completely agree with the post above. Drop the labels and fight for equality for all.