Union members back push for student number controls

Mechanism needed to stem ‘unlimited recruitment’ by wealthy institutions and resulting job cuts at other universities, say UCU activists

五月 19, 2023
Lambs are herded between pens to illustrate Union members back push for student number controls
Source: Getty

Student number controls should be reintroduced in England to end the “zero-sum game” that has allowed some institutions to prosper at the expense of others, according to academics who are attempting to instigate a big push on the issue within the University and College Union.

A motion will be debated at the UCU congress next week that calls for a “high profile campaign for the better management and distribution of student numbers across all higher education institutions”.

The union, the motion says, should commission research on “models of student distribution which can create recruitment balance in HE,” with those backing the motion saying this could involve universities being given a moving percentage target that regulates expansion year-on-year.

Student number controls were scrapped for England by the Conservative government in 2015-16, allowing some institutions – many of them members of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities – to expand rapidly.

Among the UCU branches backing the motion were those at the universities of Kent and East Anglia, which have both suffered financially after missing student recruitment targets when would-be undergraduates went elsewhere.

Balihar Sanghera, a senior lecturer in sociology at Kent who supported the motion, said higher education was marked by “increasing financial precarity” because universities were operating in a “zero-sum game in which some achieve surpluses at the expense of causing deficits at others”.

This had “caused huge misery for us all; both those institutions who are doing well and those that are struggling”, he said, pointing out that some universities that have rapidly expanded have suffered from a lack of accommodation, large class sizes and an influx of teachers on precarious contracts, while elsewhere once successful departments were facing closure.

Dave Hitchcock, senior lecturer in early modern history at Canterbury Christ Church University and one of the architects of the motion, said impressive programmes had been “hollowed out” since the cap was lifted. This was not because of their quality, he argued, saying that many achieve top scores for student satisfaction or research output.

“But reputationally they maybe aren’t as shiny,” Dr Hitchcock said. “It is a quiet tragedy that has been rumbling away in UK higher education for about a decade and we are about to see some really sad consequences of it.”

The campaign, he added, was not about capping the overall number of students going to university but developing a mechanism that would “disincentivise unlimited recruitment" at individual institutions. He said he had received support from colleagues of “all sorts of ideological positions” and it was now time for the union to decide whether to take a stand.

Reintroducing student number controls in England was said to be “under consideration” by the Westminster government earlier this year, although no further details have since materialised.

The 2022-23 admissions cycle signalled the start of more cautious offer-making by the universities that had previously expanded rapidly, with lower tariff institutions making up some ground in a move that some said was evidence new controls were not needed.

Nick Hillman, the director of the Higher Education Policy Institute who helped abolish SNCs while an adviser in the Conservative government, said it was “nonsense” to “think the best way to help the sector is to demand policymakers trample on institutional autonomy”.

“Universities rightly decide for themselves how many students to recruit, and many opt to turn down huge numbers of well-qualified applicants each year,” he added.

“The idea that the best way to improve educational opportunities at a time of rising demand is to request the Treasury to save us from ourselves is puerile stuff.”

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (3)

The Trades Union is right, and it's will not only to benefit the less attractive Universities, but also help to protect their members in popular ones that are being overloaded. One I know only too well over recruited on one of it's most popular courses (very popular with both home and overseas students), with X plus students and the largest lecture theatre holding ~1/3X the lecturers were expected to deliver the same lecture three times in one day starting at 09:00 Hrs and finishing at 22:00 Hrs, leaden balloons would have flown higher...
communist ideas of uniformity are not welcome in the UK anymore! It's time to make lecturers' salaries negotiated locally and not nationally...but at the same time it's a complete nonsense that unis are not governed by academics but by money vampires.
The higher-profile Universitites losing students from this would likely reduce staff head-count to mitigate this (e.g. by not renewing short-term teaching contracts). Job-losses would still happen, just in different places. The elephant in the room though is that the current funding model of Universities needs addressing, especially if international students have to jump through more hoops to register.