Three UK universities put on student visa ‘action plans’

Home Office guidance suggests breaches of sponsorship requirements as sector becomes more reliant on international student revenues

十二月 4, 2024
Image of man walking on beach holding red flag
Source: Getty images

Three UK universities have been placed on student visa sponsorship “action plans”.

Home Office guidance says that institutions can be placed on an action plan when they have “committed a breach, short of a serious breach” of the sponsor requirements, giving them an “opportunity to improve [their] processes in order to avoid any further breaches, and to ensure that it does not become necessary for [UK Visas and Immigration] to revoke [their] licence”, which is a requirement for enrolling international students.

Home Office records show that three UK higher education institutions are currently subject to action plans: the University of Central Lancashire (Uclan), De Montfort University and Nottingham Trent University.

The reasons the institutions have been placed on action plans have not been disclosed, but assessments cover metrics such as visa refusal, enrolment and course completion rates.

Sponsors must pay a fee when they are placed on an action plan, which typically lasts three to six months.

Jonathan Hill, a senior manager at immigration law firm Fragomen, told Times Higher Education that it was reasonably rare for large institutions to be placed on action plans, so it would be a “significant concern” for any that are.

Of the hundreds of institutions on the Home Office’s student sponsor register, which also covers colleges, independent schools and private providers, only one other – Oxford International College Brighton – is currently subject to an action plan.

It comes as the financial crisis in UK higher education has made universities ever more reliant on international student revenues to stay afloat.

“If I were involved in a day-to-day basis with any of those universities, I would have fixing this right at the top of my to-do list,” said Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute. “International students are the oil that keeps our system going…they lubricate everything else that goes on.”

Only two UK universities are known to have had their visa sponsorship licences revoked: London Metropolitan University in 2012, and Birmingham Newman University in 2018. Both have since been reinstated. Other providers have had their licences suspended in the past.

A De Montfort spokesperson said: “We take our responsibilities very seriously and are confident we will fully meet UKVI requirements in all respects.”

A Nottingham Trent spokesperson said: “We are in a routine cyclical audit by UKVI. As the audit is yet to conclude we are unable to comment any further at this time. We remain licensed to sponsor students under the student sponsor route.”

Uclan was approached for comment.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “We expect all our sponsors to adopt high standards to stamp out any abuse of the immigration system.

“It is longstanding government policy that we do not routinely comment on individual cases.”

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (3)

Attendance quality control is the central weakness for sponsors.
Students easily beat the system for recording attendance. Until we return to the old paper registration system and counting of heads in class, then the electronic attendance recording system will fail. Some work right through their courses and barely attend class. It is an open secret that the attendance quality control system is not robust at all.
new
The English language proficiency test IELTS is the only reliable one, if you wish to consider "genuine students" only; otherwise its upto the Uk universities if they wish to abuse the education system !! All the "online tests" (PTE, Oxford etc.) in this regard, involves a great deal of cheating !! Bitter truth!
ADVERTISEMENT